AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Soulless eyes pictures3/2/2023 Consider a recent study led by David Lee of the University of Colorado at Boulder who showed participants images of other people’s eyes, and asked them to determine what emotions that person was expressing. In addition to crude information processing, our eyes also convey much more sensitive signals which other people can pick up on. The first step to know what someone is thinking is to look deeply into their eyes. As participants had to remember longer strings of digits, their pupil size increased, suggesting that pupil size is related to information processing more generally. He asked participants to remember several three to seven digit numbers, which participants had to report back after two seconds. This idea was extended in a 1966 study led by Daniel Kahneman, now a Nobel-prize winning psychologist at Princeton University. Hence, changes in pupil size don’t only reflect how aroused we are, but also how relevant and interesting what we see is. But women’s pupils also responded to pictures of mothers holding babies. This should come to no surprise: after all, pupils can also reflect how aroused we are. In subsequent studies, Hess and Polt find that homosexual participants looking at semi-nude pictures of men (but not women) also had larger pupils. Female participants’ pupil sizes increased in response to viewing men, and male participants’ pupils increased in response to viewing women. In their experiment, the two experimental psychologists Hess and Polt of the University of Chicago asked male and female participants to look at semi-nude pictures of both sexes. A famous study published in 1960 suggests that how wide or narrow pupils are reflects how information is processed, and how relevant it is. The first thing to look for is changes in pupil size. And here’s the great thing about eyes: even if people don’t want you to know how they feel, they can’t change how their eyes behave. But it turns out that the eyes really might be the windows to the soul. Many singers, songwriters and writers have capitalized on it. The phrases “the eyes are the window to the soul” and “I can see it in your eyes” certainly sound poetic. But how do we know what is going on in their heads? How do we get this special access to the most private of domains-the human mind?Ī growing body of research reveals that looking at their eyes may be a neglected and powerful way to do so. We can nearly effortlessly pick up on our partner’s mood or sense that a friend dismisses our plans, without them even speaking a word. But a conscientious viewer might ask why Bigelow and Boal allow the psychology of torturers to take up so much screen time while the emotional and physical harm of victims are denied that same dignity (the same can be asked about their previous films, too, especially Zero Dark Thirty, which asks larger, philosophical questions about torture interrogation techniques).īigelow’s recent work is a cinema of big, difficult questions, but its cold treatment of trauma often leaves an empty impression, one that doesn’t make the viewer understand or appreciate the moral implications of evil.It is often easier to access someone else’s heart than their mind. It’s through the sheer amount of time they hold their casualties captive – trying to find a supposed sniper who was really just a man with a toy gun – that the psychology of sadism becomes apparent to the viewer. Krauss is the deranged one, who has found ways to justify his violent racism, but his cruel leadership inspires two fellow officers to become even more depraved than he is. Photo by WENNīut beyond these two characters, Detroit spends far too much time on the actual hotel torture. The stories of John Boyega (Star Wars: The Force Awakens) as Melvin Dismukes, a security guard who becomes embroiled in the motel incident, and Fred Temple (Jacob Latimore), a sensitive, talented soul singer, who also becomes one of the tortured victims at the motel, stand out as two unique perspectives that provide longitudinal narrative arcs into their respective experiences and how witnessing the hotel incident changes them as people. The film becomes less resonant once it moves onto the hotel incident, where two white girls on holiday socialize with several black men, before they’re abruptly interrogated by cops. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |